Monday, June 28, 2021

Classical Art- Morality

 The Classical Era

During this period of art there are two very distinct styles that emerge, Rococo and Neoclassical. Rococo is a style that is very light, pastel colors are often used, and very indulgent. While Neoclassical art is often very serious and depict morally good concepts, a very hard shift from Rococo style. This shift in style comes from the evolving public view of the monarchy and public morals.

Rococo

During the first half of the 1700's it is the wealthy and powerful aristocrats who hold the power in society, and the most influence on the art world as they were the majority of the patrons during this time.

Ceres (Summer)

Antoine Watteau, Ceres (Summer) (1717/1718), Paris, France. Courtesy of National Gallery of Art

Rococo style reflected the world of the aristocrats, over indulgent and elegant. Ceres by Antoine Watteau shows off this pastel and elegant style and was created towards the beginning of the Rococo period. This piece was a part of series based on the seasons, but the other seasons have been lost over time, and was commissioned by Pierre Crozat for his hotel in Paris. 

While not ornate as other pieces from this time, it is still beautiful and soft. I do enjoy this piece, and wish the other seasons had survived. I do think the lion is very interesting, definitely not an accurate lion, the rest of the picture is beautiful.

It was a hotel owner who commissioned it, as at the time it was only the wealthy or aristocratic who patroned the arts, who could afford to do so. They pushed forward these decorative and elegant pieces that are just for show.

Triumph of Venus

François Boucher, Triumph of Venus (1740), Paris, France Courtesy of Artsy

Boucher became someone who helped define the Rococo style as playful, and even erotic. Again this showcases the styles over the top idealization and ornate finesse. The characters within the painting are practically glowing, and cherubs fly through the sky. This piece was commissioned by Count Tessin, and showcases what the middle class were starting to get disgusted with from the artistocrats, over indulgance and loose morals. 

It is a detailed piece, and the color palette is soft. I think it is beautiful, not something I would have in my own home, because it is over the top. I find it interesting that the women all have a glow to them, especially Venus, while the males do not. I find that my eye follows the ribbon to Venus, and that despite how much is going on in the painting, she still is the main feature.

Neoclassical

The Neoclassical style is a dramatic shift away from the Rococo style as the public views on morality change. This style is more somber, darker colors, and with the discovery of Pompeii antiquities becomes prevalent again. The biggest change from Rococo is the arts depict morals and stories of heroism, rather than frivioulous scenes. 

The Death of Socrates, Jacques Louis David (French, Paris 1748–1825 Brussels), Oil on canvas

Jacques Louis David, The Death of Socrates (1787), France Courtesy of The Met

The Death of Socrates displays the somber atmosphere of neoclassical art with muted colors and heavy subject matter and is heavily influenced by antiquities. This was painted by Jacques Louis David following the French Revolution, and depicts Socrates dying for refusing to renounce his beliefs and choosing death willingly for his cause. 

Following the public's views on morality and disgust with artistocrats, the arts begin to show stories such as Socrates and other heroes or martyrs. 

I like the overall aesthetic of the Rococo period, but appreciate the messages Neoclassical art portays. I like how clean and to the point David's painting is, and how despite that Socrates is about to die he still is still giving one last lesson before his death. 


Sources

Baetjer, Katharine. “The Death of Socrates.” Metmuseum.org, 2017, www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/436105. 

Conisbee, Philip. “Ceres (Summer).” Art Object Page, 1 Jan. 2009, www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.46149.html. 

“François Boucher Artworks & Famous Paintings.” The Art Story, www.theartstory.org/artist/boucher-francois/artworks/. 

Gersh-Nesic, Beth. “Neoclassicism, an Introduction.” Khan Academy, Khan Academy, www.khanacademy.org/humanities/renaissance-reformation/rococo-neoclassicism/neo-classicism/a/neoclassicism-an-introduction. 

6 comments:

  1. Hi Jada.

    The Boucher and David paintings contrast so nicely. Their approaches were almost the complete opposite of one another. Triumph of Venus is so fantastical, sensuous, and flowing. And yet I think I find The Death of Socrates more compelling to look at. There's nothing ostensibly beautiful about it except for Socrates' conviction. I think it demonstrates that having something to say is just as important as technique or aesthetic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love the paintings you have choosen as the examples to show for Rococo style and Neoclassical style. I found it very interesting to learn how the rich aristocrats were in power and made the choices but the middle class shortly became in power and Neoclassical became the new norm. It jumped from the romance to the self-sacrificing and it was crazy learning how it happened. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great choices and it is an awesome idea to use examples for the Rococo style, as well as the Neoclassical style. The differences are extreme between the two eras, and all have completely different morals and purposes.

    I can also say that I like the messages, which are being told by the Neoclassical pieces, since most of them are dramatic and informative and about actual historic events.

    I honestly did not even see the lion in the first picture until I read the whole text and looked very closely. At first, I thought it was a very deformed dog. So, this is absolutely not my favorite art piece from the Rococo times.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I appreciate your definition and juxtaposition of the two art styles, and agree one being more aesthetically pleasing and the other more like a message to get across. I am also curious about the lion, and even more so the symbolism behind the sickle and fields of wheat!

    ReplyDelete
  6. You connected the theme to each painting well. I love the way the fabric looks in the first painting. I don't really like either style of these moralistic paintings, but you pointed out the good qualities thoroughly.

    ReplyDelete

Non-Western Art

 Nihonga Movement The Nihonga movement started in 1882 as a direct result of the forced opening of Japan in 1853 during the Meiji Period. Wh...